Environmental Responsibility

Environmental responsibility of foam products is one of GoFoam’s core values.

Foam Facts:

foam paper cup waste comparison_gofoamWhen it comes to foam, it’s not the product that’s bad, it’s the behavior – litter in every form mars the beautiful scenery that defines New England. Rather than banning foam in Maine, and the rest of New England, we should focus on educating citizens about proper disposal for the sake of beauty and ecology.

Banning foam throughout New England is not an effective way to deal with litter and will not reduce costs associated with litter cleanup. A polystyrene ban will force individuals and businesses to use alternative products such as glass, aluminum, paper, and wax-covered cardboard, which can also create litter. There is no evidence to show that litter-control costs declined in the cities that have already banned foam products because a foam ban will not stop people from littering.

“The amount of litter will not change, only its composition.” – Jean-Michel Cousteau, Environmentalist.

Polystyrene foam is often mistakenly referred to as Styrofoam, a registered trademark of the Dow Chemical Company that is used for insulation not food packaging products.

[i] Natural Resources Defense Council Environmental Defense Fund Friends of the Earth. Statement of Support for The Foodservice Packaging Institute’s Fully Halogenated Chlorofluorocarbon Voluntary Phaseout Program. 12 April 1988.

[ii] Naj, Amal Kumar. “Foam Cups Damage Environment Less Than Paper Cups, Study Says.” The Wall Street Journal. 1 February 1991. See also: Hocking, Martin B. “Is Paper Better Than Plastic?” Consumers’ Research October 1991: 28-29; Hocking, Martin B. “Reusable and Disposable Cups: An Energy-Based Evaluation.” 18 Environmental Management 6. 1994: 894; Franklin Associates, Ltd., Resource and Environmental